Certified Quality Auditor (CQA) Prasctice Exam

For third-party audits, which two factors should an auditor consider when agreeing on corrective action time?

1. The resources available to the auditor for determining when follow-up can occur and the auditee's experience in project evaluation techniques

2. The resources available to the auditee to enact the corrective action and the number of findings recorded during the audit

3. The resources available to the auditor for determining when follow-up can occur and the number of findings recorded during the audit

4. The auditee's experience in project evaluation techniques and the resources available to the auditor

The correct answer is: The resources available to the auditee to enact the corrective action and the number of findings recorded during the audit

The chosen answer is accurate because it emphasizes the relationship between the auditee's available resources and the number of findings identified during the audit. When determining a realistic timeline for implementing corrective actions, it is critical to understand how much support and resources the auditee has at their disposal. This can directly impact their ability to address the findings and implement solutions effectively. Additionally, considering the total number of findings is essential because it gives insight into the magnitude of the corrective actions needed. A greater number of findings often necessitates more time and resources, affecting how quickly the organization can enact the appropriate corrective measures. In summary, both of these factors—resources available to the auditee and the number of findings—are crucial in establishing a feasible and practical timeline for corrective actions after a third-party audit. This approach ensures that the auditor sets realistic expectations for follow-up and supports the auditee in effectively producing improvements.